
but since detection is about "PUA" (potentially unwanted application) and with remark !fsmind - better to reach their Support / Labs about. When comparing qBittorrent vs Rtorrent, the Slant community recommends qBittorrent for most people.

So, uTorrent.exe is blocked itself to prevent further dangerous step.
QBITTORRENT VS UTORRENT UTORRENT
I still use utorrent 2.2.1 because I don't have the motivation to migrate thousands of torrents and the web of shit they're attached to. Only the developers themselves know what’s in the code. That means that anyone can go into qBittorrent’s code and check for security vulnerabilities, back doors, or anything else that could cause problems. Ngl, I've never went out of my way to look at transmission so I don't know about it's level of compatibility with them. The big thing to note in our comparison is that qBittorrent is open source, while uTorrent is not.
QBITTORRENT VS UTORRENT MANUAL
No more Tedious Manual Work, Errors or Discrepancies. Improvado is an ETL platform that extracts data from 300+ pre-built connectors, transforms it, and seamlessly loads the results to wherever you need them. In addition, I am not sure how advanced detection should be (with AMSI involved or exploit protection) - but, maybe, your client just tried to perform something unexpected. If you frequent a lot of private trackers qbittorrent plays nice with a wide margin of them. uTorrent VS qBittorrent Compare uTorrent VS qBittorrent and see what are their differences. So, maybe your one is about somewhat compromised version or build? Otherwise, could you try to restart system - what if F-Secure SAFE with some internal changes and to apply them - need to restart services for further proper operating. But since your screenshot about block action, perhaps, no files were quarantined or deleted (at least, related to uTorrent).

There can be recently added feature (""Quarantined items can be reported to the Security Cloud directly from the app and file control user interface."").
